WILLIAMS v. LIEBEL et al
| SHAWN WILLIAMS |
| DAVID LIEBEL, A. WENCE and FAUST |
| 2:2023cv00039 |
| January 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/2/2023. (KAA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff SHAWN WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Certified Counselors Statement of Inmate Trust Fund Account, Resident Activity Report)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FAUST, DAVID LIEBEL, A. WENCE, filed by SHAWN WILLIAMS. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
