RICE v. VANIHEL et al
| JOHNNY L. RICE |
| FRANK VANIHEL, JOHN POWERS, RANDALL PURCELL, JOHN IVY and JOHN WALTERS |
| 2:2023cv00080 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Mario Garcia |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Matthew P. Brookman. Judge James R. Sweeney II is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 2:23-cv-00080-MPB-MG, on all future filings in this matter. (BRR) |
Filing 11
Order Directing Prisoner Payment - The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis was granted through the assessment of an initial partial filing fee. That sum has been paid. However, plaintiff is still obligated to pay the remainder of the three hundred and fifty dollars ($350.00) filing fee. Plaintiff's custodian is directed to withhold sums from the inmate trust account of JOHNNY L. RICE, 249455, and to forward such sums to the Clerk of this Court. As of the issuance of this Order, the balance of the filing fee still due in this case is $238.63. See Order. Copy to Warden via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 3/22/2023.(KAA)
|
| Filing 9 RECEIPT #4258 for partial filing fee in the amount of $111.37, paid by JOHNNY L. RICE. (DJH) |
| Filing 10 Letter received with payment from Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JDC) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JOHNNY L. RICE. (JDC) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JOHNNY L. RICE located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JOHNNY L. RICE to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JDC) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that he is assessed an initial partial filing fee of One Hundred Eleven Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($111.37). Mr. Rice will have through March 27, 2023, to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Additionally, the clerk is directed to seal the motion, dkt. #2 , as it identifies minor children by name instead of initials. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/27/2023. (KAA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JOHNNY L. RICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN IVY, JOHN POWERS, RANDALL PURCELL, FRANK VANIHEL, JOHN WALTERS, filed by JOHNNY L. RICE. (No fee paid with this filing) (DRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
