BOYD v. CUMMINGS et al
| DEREK BOYD |
| RODNEY CUMMINGS, COURTNEY STATON, MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, MADISON COUNTY, CITY OF ANDERSON, CITY OF ELWOOD, CITY OF TIPTON, TIPSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MADISION COUNTY JAIL, TIPTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, TIPTON COUNTY SHERIFF, THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, RENEA WALKER, MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, THOMAS NEWMAN and MADISION COUNTY PROSECUTOR |
| 2:2023cv00105 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #10 Order on Motion to Stay sent to DEREK BOYD. (KAA) |
| Filing 11 Mail Returned as undeliverable, no longer at facility #10 Order on Motion to Stay sent to DEREK BOYD. (JDC) |
Filing 10
ORDER denying #9 Motion to Stay. Since this case is "gone," there's nothing to stay. Copy sent to plaintiff via US mial. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 4/3/2023. (TPS)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Stay and NOTICE of Change of Address, filed by Plaintiff DEREK BOYD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as undeliverable, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward #4 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to DEREK BOYD. (JDC) |
| Filing 7 CLOSED DISMISSED/MARGINAL ENTRY - The Court acknowledges the Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, dkt. #6 . Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/17/2023.(TPS) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss without Prejudice, filed by Plaintiff DEREK BOYD. (Attachments: #1 existing es consent)(JDC) |
|
Filing 5
ENTRY DISCUSSING FILING FEE - Plaintiff, Derek Boyd, has not paid the $402 filing fee prescribed by Congress. He also appears to have "struck out" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Mr. Boyd shall have through March 31, 2023, to pay the $402 filing fee to the clerk of the district court. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. See Order. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/10/2023.(KAA)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CITY OF ANDERSON, CITY OF ELWOOD, CITY OF TIPTON, RODNEY CUMMINGS, MADISION COUNTY JAIL, MADISION COUNTY PROSECUTOR, MADISON COUNTY, MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, THOMAS NEWMAN, COURTNEY STATON, THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, TIPSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TIPTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, TIPTON COUNTY SHERIFF, RENEA WALKER, filed by DEREK BOYD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons)(DRB) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by DEREK BOYD located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by DEREK BOYD to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
