MANIS v. YELLEN
RONALD P. MANIS |
JANET YELLEN |
2:2023cv00114 |
March 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
M Kendra Klump |
James R Sweeney |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER - The March 21, 2023 Entry and Order sent to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. Based on the BOP Inmate Locator, Plaintiff is still located at Terre Haute USP. The Clerk shall resend the Entry and Order, (ECF No. #6 ), to Plaintiff along with this Order. The time for Plaintiff to show cause why a final judgment dismissing this action should not be entered is enlarged to May 10, 2023. The failure to show cause within the time allowed will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 4/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Dkt. #6 )(TPS) |
Filing 7 Mail Returned as undeliverable, not at this institution #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis sent to RONALD P. MANIS. (JDC) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twenty Dollars and Forty-Eight Cents ($20.48). Plaintiff shall have until April 21, 2023, in which to pay this sum to the Clerk of the district court. The failure to do so within the time allowed may result in dismissal of this action for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee. The Complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall have until April 21, 2023, to show cause why a final judgment dismissing this action should not be entered. The failure to do so within the time allowed will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. (SEE ORDER.) Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/21/2023. (TPS) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail. (TPS) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff, RONALD P. MANIS. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Statement, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANET YELLEN, filed by RONALD P. MANIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MANIS v. YELLEN | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RONALD P. MANIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JANET YELLEN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.