SCUTERI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
| MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI |
| STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLOBAL*TEL LINK aka VIA PATH, DUSHAN ZATECKY and T. PHEGELY |
| 2:2023cv00157 |
| March 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Court Order, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (Attachments: #1 Previously filed eConsent Form)(JRB) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Court Order, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (Attachments: #1 existing es consent)(JDC) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration on #9 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (Attachments: #1 previously filed eConsent Form)(JRB) |
Filing 9
ORDER Directing Further Proceedings - On April 3, 2023, the Court ordered the plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of Fifty-Five Dollars and Three Cents ($55.03) by May 3, 2023. Dkt. #7 . That deadline has passed and the plaintiff has failed to do so or otherwise respond. Therefore, the plaintiff shall have through June 15, 2023, to pay the initial partial filing fee or explain why doing so is not possible. The failure to do so by this date will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 5/16/2023.(LBT)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Ryan Shouse on behalf of Defendant INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (Shouse, Eric) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Fifty-Five Dollars and Three Cents ($55.03). The plaintiff shall have through May 3, 2023 in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 4/3/2023. (KAA)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (Attachments: #1 Resident Activity Report)(DJH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against GLOBALTEL LINK aka VIA PATH, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. PHEGELY, STATE OF INDIANA, and DUSHAN ZATECKY, filed by MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including letter, grievance records, and notice of tort claim records)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
