STEWART v. WIESE USA, INC. et al
Plaintiff: Special Administrato Ethan W. Stewart and ETHAN W. STEWART
Defendant: Wiese USA, Inc., Performax Global LLC, C.H.I. Overhead Doors, LLC, GFA Elektromaten GMBH & Co. KG and PERFORMAX GLOBAL, LLC
Case Number: 2:2023cv00372
Filed: July 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: M Kendra Klump
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2023 Filing 19 Transfer Letter to the Clerk of the Vigo County Court. Copies of case documents and docket enclosed. (CKM)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER - granting #17 Motion to Remand; This case is remanded to the Vigo County Indiana Superior Court for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/7/2023. Copies Sent to Vigo County (CKM)
August 4, 2023 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION to Remand , filed by Defendant C.H.I. OVERHEAD DOORS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kehl, Jeffrey)
August 1, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer L. Blackwell on behalf of Defendant WIESE USA, INC.. (Blackwell, Jennifer)
July 31, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE Second Amended Notice of Removal, filed by Defendant C.H.I. OVERHEAD DOORS, LLC, re #14 Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex B - State Court Docket: P's Appearance, Complaint, CHI Summons, Wiese Summons, Performax Summons, GFA Summons, Alias Summons to Performax, Wiese Proof of Service, Weise Delivery Confirmation, CHI Proof of Service, CHI Delivery Confirmation, P's Motion for Special Process Server, Order Granting Motion, CHI Attorney Appearance, Notice of Enlargement of Time to Answer Complaint, Performax Proof of Service, Performax Delivery Confirmation, Wiese Attorney Appearance, Wiese Motion for Enlargement of Time, Performax Attorney Appearance, Performax Notice of Enlargement of Time to Answer Complaint, Order Granting Wiese Motion for Enlargement of Time, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Wiese Consent to Removal, #4 Exhibit Ex D - Performax Consent to Removal, #5 List of Defendants) (Kehl, Jeffrey)
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER - The Court ORDERS C.H.I. to file a Second Amended Notice of Removal by August 14, 2023, which addresses the issues outlined in this Order and properly alleges a basis for this Court's diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff is reminded of his obligation to file a statement within thirty days of C.H.I.'s filing of the Amended Notice of Removal pursuant to Local Rule 81-1. The parties are advised that, to the extent the Second Amended Notice of Removal and the Local Rule 81-1 Statement reflect anything other than total agreement regarding any jurisdictional allegations, the Court will require the parties to conduct whatever investigation is necessary and file a joint jurisdictional statement confirming that all parties are in agreement with the underlying jurisdictional allegations before the litigation moves forward. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/31/2023. (JSR)
July 28, 2023 Filing 13 Amended Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by C.H.I. OVERHEAD DOORS, LLC identifying Corporate Parent ARTHUR HOLDINGS CORP., Corporate Parent Arthur Parent LLC for C.H.I. OVERHEAD DOORS, LLC. (Kehl, Jeffrey) Modified on 7/31/2023 - Updated dkt text (JSR).
July 28, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE Amended Notice of Removal, filed by Defendant C.H.I. OVERHEAD DOORS, LLC, re #10 Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex B - State Court Docket: P's Appearance, Complaint, CHI Summons, Wiese Summons, Performax Summons, GFA Summons, Alias Summons to Performax, Wiese Proof of Service, Weise Delivery Confirmation, CHI Proof of Service, CHI Delivery Confirmation, P's Motion for Special Process Server, Order Granting Motion, CHI Attorney Appearance, Notice of Enlargement of Time to Answer Complaint, Performax Proof of Service, Performax Delivery Confirmation, Wiese Attorney Appearance, Wiese Motion for Enlargement of Time, Performax Attorney Appearance, Performax Notice of Enlargement of Time to Answer Complaint, Order Granting Wiese Motion for Enlargement of Time, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Wiese Consent to removal, #4 Exhibit Ex D - Performax Consent to Removal, #5 List of Defendants) (Kehl, Jeffrey)
July 27, 2023 Filing 11 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by WIESE USA, INC. identifying Corporate Parent WIESE HOLDING COMPANY for WIESE USA, INC... (Orzeske, Donald)
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - The Court ORDERS C.H.I. to file an Amended Notice of Removal by August 14, 2023, which addresses the issues outlined in this Order and properly alleges a basis for this Court's diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff is reminded of his obligation to file a statement within thirty days of C.H.I.'s filing of the Amended Notice of Removal. C.H.I. is ORDERED to file an Amended Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by August 14, 2023, properly setting forth its citizenship. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/27/2023.(KAA)
July 27, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald G. Orzeske on behalf of Defendant WIESE USA, INC.. (Orzeske, Donald)
July 27, 2023 Filing 8 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by PERFORMAX GLOBAL, LLC identifying Corporate Parent C.H.I. Overhead Doors, LLC for PERFORMAX GLOBAL, LLC.. (Drummy, William)
July 27, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by William W. Drummy on behalf of Defendant PERFORMAX GLOBAL, LLC. (Drummy, William)
July 26, 2023 Filing 6 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, filed by Defendant C.H.I. OVERHEAD DOORS, LLC (Kehl, Jeffrey) Modified on 7/27/2023 - Updated dkt text (JSR).
July 26, 2023 Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR)
July 26, 2023 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR)
July 26, 2023 Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JSR)
July 25, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey E. Kehl on behalf of Defendant C.H.I. Overhead Doors, LLC. (Kehl, Jeffrey)
July 25, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Vigo County Superior Court, case number 84D02-2306-CT-003984, filed by C.H.I. Overhead Doors, LLC. Filing fee $402 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex B - State Court Docket: P's Appearance, Complaint, CHI Summons, Wiese Summons, Performax Summons, GFA Summons, Alias Summons to Performax, Wiese Proof of Service, Weise Delivery Confirmation, CHI Proof of Service, CHI Delivery Confirmation, P's Motion for Special Process Server, Order Granting Motion, CHI Attorney Appearance, Notice of Enlargement of Time to Answer Complaint, Performax Proof of Service, Performax Delivery Confirmation, Wiese Attorney Appearance, Wiese Motion for Enlargement of Time, Performax Attorney Appearance, Performax Notice of Enlargement of Time to Answer Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Wiese Consent to removal, #4 Exhibit Ex D - Performax Consent to Removal, #5 List of Defendants, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Kehl, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STEWART v. WIESE USA, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Special Administrato Ethan W. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ETHAN W. STEWART
Represented By: Stephen M. Wagner
Represented By: Timothy Loren Karns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wiese USA, Inc.
Represented By: Donald G. Orzeske
Represented By: Jennifer L. Blackwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Performax Global LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.H.I. Overhead Doors, LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey E. Kehl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GFA Elektromaten GMBH & Co. KG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PERFORMAX GLOBAL, LLC
Represented By: William W. Drummy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?