STEPHENS v. PRETORIUS
| JAMES STEPHENS |
| TRICIA PRETORIUS |
| 2:2023cv00376 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| M Kendra Klump |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 8/16/2023.(JRB) |
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING SUCCESSIVE 28 U.S.C. 2254 PETITION - Mr. Stephens does not assert that he has obtained permission from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to file a successive 2254 petition. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Final judgment shall now issue. In addition, the trust account statement attached to Mr. Stephens' motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis indicates that he has sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action. Thus, his motion, dkt. #4 , is denied. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 8/16/2023. (JRB)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Disclosure Statement, filed by Petitioner JAMES STEPHENS (Attachments: #1 Previously filed eConsent Form) (JRB) |
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner JAMES STEPHENS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(CCG) |
| Filing 3 Brief (Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition) re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by JAMES STEPHENS. (CCG) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAMES STEPHENS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JAMES STEPHENS located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JAMES STEPHENS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: STEPHENS v. PRETORIUS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JAMES STEPHENS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: TRICIA PRETORIUS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
