MARTIN v. THOMPSON et al
| ANTHONY MARTIN |
| ZARAK THOMPSON, CHRISTOPHER CUPP, NICHALAUS DONOVAN, ERIC DRADA and LAUREN CUPP |
| 2:2023cv00408 |
| August 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Robert Carlisle on behalf of Defendants CHRISTOPHER CUPP, NICHALAUS DONOVAN, ERIC DRADA, ZARAK THOMPSON. (Carlisle, Alexander) |
| Filing 10 Documents to be Sent via Electronic Notice - re #9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk, #8 Order, #2 Complaint Electronic Notice to Wexford and IDOC. (JRB) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to 1) Zarak Thompson; 2) Christopher Cupp; 3) Nichalaus Donovan; 4) Eric Drada; and 5) Nurse Lauren Cupp. (JRB) |
Filing 8
Order Screening the Complaint and Directing Service of Process - If Mr. Martin believes the complaint contains additional viable claims under Count 9, he may file a notice identifying those claims within 21 days of the issuance of this Order. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Ofc. Zarak Thompson, Ofc. Christopher Cupp, Ofc. Nichalaus Donovan, Sgt. Eric Drada, and Nurse Lauren Cupp in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. #2 , applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Order. The clerk is directed to serve the Indiana Department of Correction employees electronically. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to distribution list via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/3/2023.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) when able. No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/30/2023. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JSR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ANTHONY MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Fund Account, #2 Envelope) (JSR) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CHRISTOPHER CUPP, LAUREN CUPP, NICHALAUS DONOVAN, ERIC DRADA, ZARAK THOMPSON, filed by ANTHONY MARTIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope) (JSR) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER - Mr. Martin subsequently filed a motion asking the Court to open new causes of action for the allegations set forth in Counts 5-11. (Dkt. 13). That motion, dkt. 13, is GRANTED. The CLERK SHALL open seven new causes of action. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/10/2023. (JSR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
