BOYKINS v. ELLIS et al
| MAURICE BOYKINS |
| MICHAEL ELLIS, WARDEN, BUILDING LIEUTENATE, YARBER OMBUDSMAN BUREAU, HILL, DOWNER and JOHN DOE |
| 2:2023cv00421 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order Granting Motion for Forms - The plaintiff's motion for forms, dkt. #8 , is granted. The clerk shall include a form motion for assistance with recruiting counsel with his copy of this Order. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 9/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Counsel Form) (KAA)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #7 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order - The clerk is directed to include a form motion for preliminary injunction with the plaintiff's copy of this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 9/28/203. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Form) (JRB)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Four Dollars and Fifty Cents ($4.50). The plaintiff shall have through October 26, 2023, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 9/27/2023. (JRB) Modified on 9/28/2023 (JRB).
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Forms, filed by Plaintiff MAURICE BOYKINS. (KAA) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff MAURICE BOYKINS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MAURICE BOYKINS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through September 25, 2023, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BUILDING LIEUTENATE, JOHN DOE, DOWNER, MICHAEL ELLIS, HILL, WARDEN, YARBER OMBUDSMAN BUREAU, filed by MAURICE BOYKINS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
