UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERSONAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION, LLC et al
| United Specialty Insurance Company |
| Personal Assistance Services and Transportation LLC, Amalgamated Casualty Insurance Company, Brandy Salisbury, Keith Kimmerle and PERSONAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION, LLC |
| 2:2023cv00424 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by AMALGAMATED CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.(Stafford, Casey) |
| Filing 15 Alias Summons Issued as to PERSONAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION, LLC, BRANDY SALISBURY. (AAS) |
| Filing 14 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to PERSONAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION, LLC. (Kehl, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to BRANDY SALISBURY. (Kehl, Jeffrey) |
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: This matter is scheduled for a telephonic initial pretrial conference on Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern). Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan ("CMP") no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 10/2/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant AMALGAMATED CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Stafford, Casey) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Casey Ray Stafford on behalf of Defendant AMALGAMATED CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Stafford, Casey) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by KEITH KIMMERLE.(Byron, Rom) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Rom Byron on behalf of Defendant KEITH KIMMERLE. (Byron, Rom) |
| Filing 7 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before District Judge Matthew P. Brookman. (AAS) |
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (AAS) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to AMALGAMATED CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, KEITH KIMMERLE, PERSONAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION, LLC, BRANDY SALISBURY. (AAS) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by United Specialty Insurance Company. (Kehl, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey E. Kehl on behalf of Plaintiff United Specialty Insurance Company. (Kehl, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief Pursuant to Federal Declaratory Judgment Act against All Defendants, filed by United Specialty Insurance Company. Filing fee $402 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Salisbury and PAST's Answer to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Confirmation of Coverage, #4 Exhibit Ex D - Letter, #5 Proposed Summons Summons - Personal Assistance Services and Transportation, LLC, #6 Proposed Summons Summons - Amalgamated Casualty Insurance Company, #7 Proposed Summons Summons - Brandy Salisbury, #8 Proposed Summons Summons - Keith Kimmerle, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kehl, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
