BAUGH v. PARKE CO IN SHERIFF'S DPT et al
| WILLIAM E. BAUGH |
| PARKE CO IN SHERIFF'S DPT, PARKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT #1, STATE OF INDIANA, PARKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR, VERMILLION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SAM A. SUAIR, JILL WELSCH, STEVEN A. CVENGNES, JUSTIN COLE, D. LEWELEN, CLOVER and KOCH |
| 2:2023cv00476 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| M Kendra Klump |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION For Time to Pay Filing Fee, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM E. BAUGH. (AAS) Modified to correct event on 12/7/2023 (JRT). |
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - On October 4, 2023, the Court ordered the plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of Forty-Six Dollars and Twenty-Nine Cents ($46.29) by October 31, 2023. That deadline has passed, and the plaintiff has failed to do so or otherwise respond. Therefore, the plaintiff shall have through December 15, 2023, to pay the initial partial filing fee or explain why doing so is not possible. The failure to do so by this date will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/20/2023.(TPS)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #4 MOTION FOR ASSISTANCE WITH RECRUITING COUNSEL - Mr. Baugh's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted. He has through October 31, 2023, to pay an initial partial filing fee of Forty-Six Dollars and Twenty-Nine Cents ($46.29). Mr. Baugh's motion to appoint counsel, dkt. #4 , is denied without prejudice. Mr. Baugh may renew his motion by completing the enclosed motion for assistance recruiting counsel form, but only after he has attempted to recruit counsel on his own. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/04/2023. (Attachments: #1 Form Motion for Assistance Recruiting Counsel) (AAS)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM E. BAUGH. (CCG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM E. BAUGH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CLOVER, JUSTIN COLE, STEVEN A. CVENGNES, KOCH, D. LEWELEN, PARKE CO IN SHERIFF'S DPT, PARKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT #1, PARKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR, STATE OF INDIANA, SAM A. SUAIR, VERMILLION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, JILL WELSCH, filed by WILLIAM E. BAUGH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by WILLIAM E. BAUGH located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by WILLIAM E. BAUGH to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
