HOLDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR. |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and T.J. WATSON |
| STEVEN KALLIS |
| 2:2023cv00524 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| M Kendra Klump |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration and Granting Motion for Extension of Time: Mr. Holder's motion for reconsideration, dkt. #9 , is denied, and Respondents' motion for an extension of time, dkt. #11 , is granted. Respondents will have through March 29, 2024, to file their response to the 2241 petition. See Order. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 1/12/2024. (LF)
|
| Filing 12 REPLY in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION for Reconsideration of Sua Sponte Second Order to Show Cause MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default , filed by Petitioner NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR. (Franco, Gene) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION for Reconsideration of Sua Sponte Second Order to Show Cause MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default , AND MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Respondents STEVEN KALLIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wood, James) Modified to correct party designation and event on 1/10/2024 (JRT). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James Robert Wood on behalf of Defendants STEVEN KALLIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Wood, James) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration of Sua Sponte Second Order to Show Cause (), MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default , filed by Plaintiff NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR. (Franco, Gene) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent shall have until February 13, 2024, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. SEE ORDER. Electronic Notice to United States Attorney. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 1/2/2024.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent shall have until December 27, 2023, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. SEE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 11/16/2023.(JRB)
|
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gene Allen Franco on behalf of Plaintiff NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR. (Franco, Gene) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Eliza Meredith on behalf of Plaintiff NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR. (Meredith, Eliza) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Meredith, Eliza) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meredith, Eliza) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
