SOLIS v. USA
ARTURO SOLIS |
USA |
2:2023cv00532 |
November 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
M Kendra Klump |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RETURN of USM Service - Office of US Attorney served on 12/12/2023 via Fed Ex. (KAA) |
Filing 15 RETURN of USM Service - US Attorney General served on 12/13/2023 via FedEx. (KAA) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to Resolve Filing Fee, filed by Plaintiff ARTURO SOLIS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(SWM) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying as moot #12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Because this cause of action has been dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiff's new motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #12 , is denied as moot. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/28/2023. (JRB) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ARTURO SOLIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(BRR) |
Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT: The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. See Order. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/21/2023. (LF) |
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE: Plaintiff Arturo Solis is an inmate at Terre Haute - USP. On November 17, 2023, he filed a civil complaint in this Court alleging that he slipped and fell in a puddle of water due to the negligence of prison officials. Dkt. 1, p. 2. This Court screened Plaintiff's complaint and determined that he had stated an actionable claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Dkt. 5, p.2. Plaintiff also sought permission to proceed without paying a filing fee. Dkt. 2. This Court issued a notice of deficiency requiring Plaintiff to transmit a copy of his inmate trust account statement before ruling on the matter. Dkt. 8. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. See Order. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/21/2023. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (LF) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through January 2, 2024, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. MAIL (Attachments: #1 Form Motion for IFP) (MEH) |
Filing 7 Documents for service by USM - re #6 Summons Issued, #5 Order, #1 Complaint. Electronic notice to USM-C.(JRB) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to USA. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 - US Attorney General, #2 USM 285 - Office of US Attorney)(JRB) |
Filing 5 Order Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through January 5, 2024, in which to identify those claims. The clerk is directed to issue a single summons to the United States attorney for this district and the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1). The Marshal for this District is directed to serve the summons and complaint by registered or certified mail at the expense of the United States. SEE ORDER. Electronic Notice to USMS-C. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/7/2023.(JRB) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ARTURO SOLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA, filed by ARTURO SOLIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SOLIS v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ARTURO SOLIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.