SCHREANE v. KALLIS et al
Petitioner: CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Respondent: STEVE KALLIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TENNESSEE
Case Number: 2:2023cv00557
Filed: December 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: M Kendra Klump
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2024 Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/18/2024.(JRB)
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY - The Court denies a certificate of appealability. Mr. Schreane's petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Final judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/18/2024.(JRB)
January 17, 2024 Filing 8 RESPONSE re #4 Order to Show Cause, filed by Petitioner CLARENCE D. SCHREANE. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(KAA)
December 21, 2023 Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by CLARENCE D. SCHREANE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BRR)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Having notified Mr. Schreane that his petition shall be treated by the Court as a petition for habeas corpus under 2254, he shall have through January 16, 2024, to 1) pay the $5.00 filing fee or demonstrate his inability to do so; and 2) show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as an unauthorized successive petition. Failure to meet this deadline will result in the dismissal of the action without further warning. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/15/2023.(KAA)
December 7, 2023 Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG)
December 7, 2023 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG)
December 4, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CLARENCE D. SCHREANE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Affidavit of Truth, #4 Envelope)(CCG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCHREANE v. KALLIS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STEVE KALLIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TENNESSEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?