SWADER v. RULE
SWADER and KHALIL ANTONIO SWADER |
T. RULE |
2:2023cv00585 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Mario Garcia |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - On or before February 26, 2024, Petitioner shall show cause why his 2241 petition should not be dismissed. In addition, on or before February 26, 2024, Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee for this case or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to respond to this Order will result in the dismissal of the habeas petition without further notice. The clerk is directed to update the Petitioner's name and registration number on the docket consistent with the distribution portion of this Order. (SEE ORDER.) Copy sent to petitioner via US mail. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 1/29/2024.(TPS) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge, filed by SWADER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SWM) |
Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SWADER. (No fee paid with this filing) (CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.