WHITE v. BOOTS et al
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE
Defendant: MATTHEW BOOTS and BRIDGETT FOY
Case Number: 2:2024cv00030
Filed: January 29, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #3 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ASSESSING INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE: Christopher White's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted to the extent that he is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $27.56. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b) (1). Mr. White will have through March 22, 2024, to pay this sum to the clerk of the District Court. See Order. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/26/2024. (LF)
February 12, 2024 Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE. (LBT)
January 31, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT)
January 29, 2024 Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH)
January 29, 2024 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
January 29, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Offender Trust Account, Resident Statement)(DJH)
January 29, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against MATTHEW BOOTS, BRIDGETT FOY, filed by CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH)
January 29, 2024 Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITE v. BOOTS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER AARON WHITE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTHEW BOOTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIDGETT FOY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?