BEDWELL v. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff: REBECCA J. BEDWELL
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Case Number: 2:2024cv00059
Filed: February 20, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mario Garcia
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2024 Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by MARTIN J O'MALLEY. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative records, #3 payment records, #4 jurisdictional records, #5 non disability records, #6 disability records, #7 medical records)(Wierenga, Julian)
April 17, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay Hinsley on behalf of Defendant MARTIN J O'MALLEY. (Hinsley, Jay)
April 4, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant MARTIN J O'MALLEY. (Wierenga, Julian)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/21/2024. (SWM)
February 21, 2024 Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (AJG)
February 21, 2024 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AJG)
February 21, 2024 Filing 4 Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. (AJG)
February 20, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Adriana Maria de la Torre on behalf of Plaintiff REBECCA J. BEDWELL. (de la Torre, Adriana)
February 20, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff REBECCA J. BEDWELL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(de la Torre, Adriana)
February 20, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Seeking Judicial Review against MARTIN O'MALLEY, filed by REBECCA J. BEDWELL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(de la Torre, Adriana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BEDWELL v. O'MALLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REBECCA J. BEDWELL
Represented By: Adriana Maria de la Torre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Represented By: Julian Clifford Wierenga
Represented By: Jay Hinsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?