VICKREY et al v. TROUT et al
BRIAN VICKREY, BENEFICIARIES OF MARY MURPHY'S ESTATE and BENEFICIARIES OF MARY MURPHY'S BANK ACCOUNTS & LIFE INSURANCE |
JOSEPH TROUT, ERIC SOMHEIL, CHARLES HEAR, BRADLEY BOUGH, CASSEY MARTIN, MKILLOP TRIPLETS, GINGER WETZ, LIZ WETZ, MIKE WETZ, 1ST FINANCIAL BANK, ECONO CHECK and PLATEAU INS. |
2:2024cv00099 |
March 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
James R Sweeney |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 3 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRIAN VICKREY. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRIAN VICKREY. (DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1ST FINANCIAL BANK, BRADLEY BOUGH, ECONO CHECK, CHARLES HEAR, CASSEY MARTIN, MKILLOP TRIPLETS, PLATEAU INS., ERIC SOMHEIL, JOSEPH TROUT, GINGER WETZ, LIZ WETZ, MIKE WETZ, filed by BRIAN VICKREY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including state court records, First Financial Bank IDProtect, Beneficiary Information, EconoCheck Proof of Loss -- Accidental Death)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.