GRIGSBY v. VANIHIL et al
DESHAWN GRIGSBY |
LEFFLER, SIMMERMAN, VANIHIL and EDWARD |
2:2024cv00473 |
October 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RECEIPT #13105 for Partial Filing fee in the amount of $1.00, paid by DESHAWN GRIGSBY. (CCG) |
Filing 10 RECEIPT #13049 for Partial Filing fee in the amount of $18.79, paid by DESHAWN GRIGSBY. (CCG) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nineteen Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($19.72). The plaintiff shall have through December 2, 2024, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. (SEE ORDER.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/31/2024. (TPS) |
Filing 8 Submission of Proposed Waiver of Service of Summons, filed by Plaintiff DESHAWN GRIGSBY. (AJG) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DESHAWN GRIGSBY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through 11/15/2024 in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 405.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Form Motion IFP) (MRI) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against EDWARD, LEFFLER, SIMMERMAN, VANIHIL, filed by DESHAWN GRIGSBY. (No fee paid with this filing) (CCG) |
Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by DESHAWN GRIGSBY located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by DESHAWN GRIGSBY to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.