THOMAS v. U.S. DIS COURT SO. DIS. OF IND. et al
GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR. |
UNITED STATES (MERRICK GARLAND), U.S. DIS COURT SO. DIS. OF IND. and MATTHEW P. BROOKMAN |
2:2024cv00480 |
October 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
M Kendra Klump |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to District Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. District Judge Matthew P. Brookman is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 2:24-cv-480-JMS-MKK, on all future filings in this matter. (DJH) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Clerk is directed to randomly reassign case and notify parties of newly assigned Judge. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 10/9/2024. Sent to Plaintiff via US Mail.(LES) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (KLS) (CCG) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MATTHEW P. BROOKMAN, U.S. DIS COURT SO. DIS. OF IND., UNITED STATES (MERRICK GARLAND), filed by GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (CCG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.