SANDERS v. COLVIN
| GREGORY SANDERS |
| CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
| 2:2024cv00532 |
| November 12, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER - This matter is before the Court on Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record. #9 The Court, being duly advised, hereby GRANTS the motion. Defendant is granted an enlargement of time, until February 12, 2025, to file Defendant's Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/6/2025. (JRB)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to February 12, 2025 in which to #1 Complaint , filed by Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Donohoe, Elisa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Shelese M. Woods on behalf of Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Woods, Shelese) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Elisa Donohoe on behalf of Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Donohoe, Elisa) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - Mr. Sanders's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Dkt. #2 . (See Order.) Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/13/2024. (JSR)
|
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. ***TEXT ONLY ENTRY*** (KAA) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Adriana Maria de la Torre on behalf of Plaintiff GREGORY SANDERS. (de la Torre, Adriana) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff GREGORY SANDERS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(de la Torre, Adriana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Seeking Judicial Review against MARTIN O'MALLEY, filed by GREGORY SANDERS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(de la Torre, Adriana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SANDERS v. COLVIN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GREGORY SANDERS | |
| Represented By: | Adriana Maria de la Torre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN | |
| Represented By: | Shelese M. Woods |
| Represented By: | Elisa Donohoe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
