HUGHLEY v. VIGO COUNTY, INDIANA et al
| RYAN L. HUGHLEY |
| VIGO COUNTY, INDIANA, JOHN PLASSE, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR and JOHN/JANE DOE MAILROOM OFFICERS 1-10 |
| 2:2026cv00575 |
| August 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER ON PRO SE INMATE CIVIL RIGHTS FILINGS - These general procedures apply to all non-habeas civil filings of pro se inmates and their opponents in federal, state, or county custody. The parties must carefully read and comply with this Order. The purpose of this Order is to provide guidance to the parties while also promoting the efficient management of the case. The failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions, up to and including the dismissal of this action. (See Order.). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on August 17, 2026. (DJH)
|
| Filing 3 Notice Regarding Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (KLS) (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN/JANE DOE MAILROOM OFFICERS 1-10, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, JOHN PLASSE, VIGO COUNTY, INDIANA, filed by RYAN L. HUGHLEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
