THOMAS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
Plaintiff: GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR.
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and CENTURION
Case Number: 2:2026cv00599
Filed: September 3, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James Russell Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ON PRO SE INMATE CIVIL RIGHTS FILINGS - These general procedures apply to all non-habeas civil filings of pro se inmates and their opponents in federal, state, or county custody. The parties must carefully read and comply with this Order. The purpose of this Order is to provide guidance to the parties while also promoting the efficient management of the case. The failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions, up to and including the dismissal of this action. (See Order.). Signed by Chief District Judge James Russell Sweeney, II on September 3, 2026. (JHS)
September 3, 2026 Filing 6 Notice Regarding Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (KLS) (JHS)
September 3, 2026 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JHS)
September 3, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE, Consent, and Reference of Authorization to a Magistrate Judge in this Civil Case, filed by Plaintiff GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR (JHS)
September 3, 2026 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT in Support of Request for Issuance of Subpoena by GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR. (JHS)
September 3, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR. (JHS)
September 3, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CENTURION, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF INDIANA, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, filed by GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (JHS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMAS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CENTURION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?