FUQUAY v. HELDT, et al
| 3:2009cv00166 |
| November 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Richard L. Young |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/12/2010. (SMD)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER DISMISSED claims against defendants Carl Heldt, David Kiely, Stanley Levco, Stephen Owens and Barbara Williams as legally insufficient; and denying as moot 27 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. No partial final judgment shall issue as to the claims resolved in this Entry. The unresolved claims against defendants Eric Williams and Kenny Roy remain. These defendants and plaintiff shall have through 7/16/10 to file any dispositive motion. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/27/2010. (SMD)
|
|
Filing
22
ENTRY denying motion for appointment of counsel 19 . Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/18/2010.(SMD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FUQUAY v. HELDT, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
