HIGGINS et al v. KOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
| JOHN TAYLOR, RACHEL TAYLOR, SARAH TAYLOR, JENNIFER HIGGINS and KENT HIGGINS |
| KOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION |
| 3:2011cv00081 |
| June 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Evansville Office |
| Richard L. Young |
| William G. Hussmann |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
232
CLOSED - SUMMARY JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/5/2014.(TMD)
|
|
Filing
173
ENTRY granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 110 Motion to exclude Dr. Margherita; granting Defendant's 155 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' untimely response. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 12/3/2013. (PG)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 145 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/18/2013. (TMD)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER granting 127 Motion to Compel Discovery Response to Defendant's Second Request for Production. Rachel Taylor and Sarah Taylor will have thirty (30) days from this entry to respond to Defendant's Request. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr., on 7/5/2013. (NRN)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying 57 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr., on 10/29/2012. (NRN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
