INDIAN INDUSTRIES INC. v. RAINBOW PLAYSYSTEMS INC.
Plaintiff: INDIAN INDUSTRIES INC.
Defendant: RAINBOW PLAYSYSTEMS INC.
Case Number: 3:2011cv00139
Filed: November 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Evansville Office
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting Defendant's 14 Motion to Set Aside 11 Clerk's Entry of Default. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/23/2012. (TMD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: INDIAN INDUSTRIES INC. v. RAINBOW PLAYSYSTEMS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAINBOW PLAYSYSTEMS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: INDIAN INDUSTRIES INC.
Represented By: William A. McKenna
Represented By: Charles Johnson Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?