REDD v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA et al
Plaintiff: KIVON D. REDD
Defendant: JOHN PIESCHALSKI, BRAD HILL, MICHAEL R. WARD and CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA
Case Number: 3:2012cv00070
Filed: May 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Evansville Office
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER denying as moot 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 68 Motion for Oral Argument. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/30/2014. (TMD)
April 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Reconsideration re re 57 Order on Motion to Seal Document filed by MICHAEL R. WARD, JOHN PIESCHALSKI, BRAD HILL, CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA. The documents tendered to the Court may be filed under seal. However, the Court does not grant the motion to maintain the documents under seal once a judicial ruling has occurred. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 4/9/2014. (NMT) (Main Document 74 replaced on 4/9/2014) (NMT).
April 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr: Motion Hearing held on 3/28/2013 re 22 MOTION to Compel filed by KIVON D. REDD, 29 MOTION for Protective Order filed by MICHAEL R. WARD, J OHN PIESCHALSKI, BRAD HILL, CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA. The courtgrants in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Compel; grants in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Protective Order. See entry for specifics. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr.(NRN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REDD v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN PIESCHALSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRAD HILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL R. WARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIVON D. REDD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?