VOGLER, SR. et al v. JAMES R. POSHARD & SON, INC. et al

Plaintiff: TIFFANY M. VOGLER, THOMAS VOGLER, JR. and THOMAS VOGLER, SR.
Defendant: JAMES R. POSHARD & SON, INC., POSHARD LOGISTICS, LLC and JONATHAN SHEALEY
Case Number: 3:2014cv00105
Filed: July 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Evansville Office
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2015 Filing 162 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 151 Motion for Sanctions and to Open Discovery for Limited Purpose to Allow Second Deposition of Defendant Shealey and denying as moot Defendants' 160 Motion for Designation of Location of Jonathan Shealey's Second Deposition. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 11/4/2015. (TMD)
October 20, 2015 Filing 154 ORDER granting Defendants' 73 Partial Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' Claim for Punitive Damages. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/20/2015. (TMD)
September 8, 2015 Filing 109 ORDER granting Poshard Logistics, LLC's 69 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/8/2015. (TMD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VOGLER, SR. et al v. JAMES R. POSHARD & SON, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES R. POSHARD & SON, INC.
Represented By: Christopher P. Leritz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: POSHARD LOGISTICS, LLC
Represented By: Christopher P. Leritz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JONATHAN SHEALEY
Represented By: Christopher P. Leritz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TIFFANY M. VOGLER
Represented By: Gregory G. Fenlon
Represented By: Burton Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS VOGLER, JR.
Represented By: Gregory G. Fenlon
Represented By: Burton Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS VOGLER, SR.
Represented By: Gregory G. Fenlon
Represented By: Burton Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?