FARRAR v. APEX BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, LLP
| CHARLOTTE FARRAR |
| APEX BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, LLP |
| 3:2017cv00079 |
| May 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Evansville Office |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 36 Motion for Approval and to Facilitate Notice to Collective Plaintiffs - The Court hereby approves the Notice and Consent Form found at 38 -1 and 38 -2. The Court further ORDERS that, within twenty days of this Entry, the Defenda nt shall provide the Plaintiff the names and last known addresses of (1) all of the Defendant's current and former employees who held hourly non-exempt positions as "Home Manager" and/or "Lead" who worked from January 1, 2015 , to September 30, 2016; and (2) all of the Defendant's current and former employees who held hourly non-exempt positions as "Direct Support Professionals" who worked from January 1, 2015, to September 30, 2015. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/15/2017. (JRB)
|
|
Filing
37
ENTRY REGARDING PROPOSED NOTICE - The Court previously denied the parties' Agreed 33 Motion for Approval and to Facilitate Notice to Collective Plaintiffs Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) without prejudice and directed theparties to refile the motion with certain changes consistent with its Entry. Theparties have attempted to do so but, the Court assumes inadvertently, they failed to incorporate some of the changes requested by the Court. Accordingly, the Court takes the amended motion for approval, 36 , under advisement pending the filing of an amended proposed class notice. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/9/2017.(JRB)
|
|
Filing
33
ENTRY ON AGREED MOTION FOR APPROVAL - This cause is before the Court on the parties' Agreed Motion for Approval and to Facilitate Notice to Collective Plaintiffs Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) 29 . For the reasons set forth below, the motio n is DENIED, without prejudice to refile the motion consistent with this Entry. The earlier motion for approval 22 is also DENIED, as it wasmooted by the filing of the agreed motion. If counsel agree with the changes set forth above, they should include them in the Notice submitted with any amended motion for approval. If they do not, they should include anexplanation of their position in any amended motion. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/29/2017. (JRB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FARRAR v. APEX BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, LLP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: APEX BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, LLP | |
| Represented By: | James P. Casey |
| Represented By: | Clifford R. Whitehead |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHARLOTTE FARRAR | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Elizabeth Berger |
| Represented By: | Kyle Frederick Biesecker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
