REXING QUALITY EGGS v. REMBRANDT ENTERPRISES, INC.
| REXING QUALITY EGGS |
| REMBRANDT ENTERPRISES, INC. |
| 3:2017cv00141 |
| September 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Evansville Office |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| Richard L. Young |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
314
AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58 -Pursuant to the Court's order on this date, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action in favor of Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc., and against Rexing Quality Eggs, Joseph L. Rexing, Leo R. Rexing, and Dylan Rexing, for a total amount of $2,689,965.55. SEE JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/16/2021.(JRB)
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER - Rembrandts Motion for Reasonable Attorneys Fees, Prejudgment Interest, and Costs, 216 , is DENIED. Final Judgment shall issue accordingly. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/31/2020. (JRB)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER - re 71 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by REMBRANDT ENTERPRISES, INC. In 2016, Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. ("Rembrandt") entered into an agreement to sell cage-free eggs to Rexing Quality Eggs ("Rexing&quo t;), the doing-business-as designation for Leo and Joseph Rexing's egg selling partnership.1 The contract required Rembrandt to provide Rexing with approximately 3,240,000 eggs per week for one year, subject to possible extensions. But cra cks quickly formed in parties' relationship, which ultimately spoiled, leaving 16 weeks-worth of ordered eggs (over 50 million eggs) on Rembrandt's kitchen table. This lawsuit followed. Rexing alleges that its continued performance was e xcused and that Rembrandt sold deficient eggs. Rembrandt counterclaims, alleging that Rexing breached the contract by refusing egg shipments and repudiating the purchase agreement. Rembrandt's partial Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 71 ], currently pends before the Court. The Court therefore GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Rembrandt's Motion. The Court ORDERS Rembrandt to show cause, on or before January 11, 2019, why it should not grant summary judgment in Dylan Rexi ng's favor as to Rembrandt's breach of contract claim against him. The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge confer with the parties at his earliest convenience to attempt to mediate a negotiated resolution to this matter. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/21/2018.(RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: REXING QUALITY EGGS v. REMBRANDT ENTERPRISES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: REMBRANDT ENTERPRISES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Tony W. Fehrenbacher |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Manion |
| Represented By: | Jeremy A Williamson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: REXING QUALITY EGGS | |
| Represented By: | James D. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
