ESTES v. APEX TRAILER SERVICE, LLC et al

Plaintiff: SAMUEL ESTES
Defendant: APEX TRAILER SALES, INC. and APEX TRAILER SERVICE, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv00045
Filed: March 9, 2018
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Evansville Office
Referring Judge: Matthew P. Brookman
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ESTES v. APEX TRAILER SERVICE, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APEX TRAILER SALES, INC.
Represented By: Danny E. Glass
Represented By: FINE & HATFIELD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APEX TRAILER SERVICE, LLC
Represented By: Danny E. Glass
Represented By: FINE & HATFIELD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SAMUEL ESTES
Represented By: Heather R. Falks
Represented By: David W. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?