STEIN v. VECTREN CORPORATION et al
| SHIVA STEIN |
| PATRICK K. MULLEN, VECTREN CORPORATION, CARL L. CHAPMAN, DERRICK BURKS, JOHN D. ENGELBRECHT, JAMES H. DEGRAFFENREIDT, JR., ROBERT G. JONES, JEAN L. WOJTOWICZ, TERESA J. TANNER, MICHAEL L. SMITH, R. DANIEL SADLIER and ANTON H. GEORGE |
| 3:2018cv00117 |
| July 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Evansville Office |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DERRICK BURKS, CARL L. CHAPMAN, JAMES H. DEGRAFFENREIDT, JR, JOHN D. ENGELBRECHT, ANTON H. GEORGE, ROBERT G. JONES, PATRICK K. MULLEN, R. DANIEL SADLIER, MICHAEL L. SMITH, TERESA J. TANNER, VECTREN CORPORATION, JEAN L. WOJTOWICZ. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by William N. Riley on behalf of Plaintiff SHIVA STEIN. (Riley, William) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James Piatt on behalf of Plaintiff SHIVA STEIN. (Piatt, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4960288) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Piatt, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
