NISENSHAL v. VECTREN CORPORATION et al
MICHAEL NISENSHAL |
PATRICK K. MULLEN, MICHAEL L. SMITH, VECTREN CORPORATION, CARL L. CHAPMAN, DERRICK BURKS, JOHN D. ENGELBRECHT, JAMES H. DEGRAFFENREIDT, JR., ROBERT G. JONES, JEAN L. WOJTOWICZ, TERESA J. TANNER, R. DANIEL SADLIER and ANTON H. GEORGE |
3:2018cv00121 |
July 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Evansville Office |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DERRICK BURKS, CARL L. CHAPMAN, JAMES H. DEGRAFFENREIDT, JR, JOHN D. ENGELBRECHT, ANTON H. GEORGE, ROBERT G. JONES, PATRICK K. MULLEN, R. DANIEL SADLIER, MICHAEL L. SMITH, TERESA J. TANNER, VECTREN CORPORATION, JEAN L. WOJTOWICZ. (JRB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Colin E. Flora on behalf of Plaintiff MICHAEL NISENSHAL. (Flora, Colin) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric S. Pavlack on behalf of Plaintiff MICHAEL NISENSHAL. (Pavlack, Eric) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4963704) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Pavlack, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.