LEVELS v. SPENCER
| REKO D. LEVELS |
| JOE SPENCER |
| 3:2018cv00146 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Evansville Office |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket Sheet, filed by Reko Levels. (Attachments: #1 Public Docket Sheet) (JRB) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only) located at BRANCHVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only) to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JRB) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and to Amend Complaint, filed by Plaintiff REKO D. LEVELS. (JRB) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Plaintiff Reko Levels's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. 2 , is denied as presented. The clerk is directed to restrict this motion, 2 , to court users only. Mr. Levels shall have throughSeptember 4, 2018, in which to renew his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing fee. Mr. Levels shall have through September 4, 2018, to file an amended complaint that asserts a claim upon which relief may be granted or otherwise show cause why this action should not be dismissed. If he fails to do so in the time allotted, this action will be dismissed without further notice or opportunity to show cause. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US MAil. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 8/22/2018. (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 Submission of Signature Page re #1 Complaint by REKO D. LEVELS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOE SPENCER, filed by REKO D. LEVELS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LEVELS v. SPENCER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOE SPENCER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: REKO D. LEVELS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
