SMITH v. MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC.
| TABITHA SMITH |
| MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. |
| 3:2018cv00150 |
| August 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. . (Bame, Jennifer) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 11/21/2018 at 09:00 AM (Central Time) before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 9/19/2018.(JRB)
|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. identifying Corporate Parent MacLellan Services, Inc. for MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC... (Bame, Jennifer) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer L. Bame on behalf of Defendant MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC.. (Bame, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen Biggs Wright on behalf of Defendant MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC.. (Wright, Kathleen) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. (LAB) (JRB) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC..(Wright, Kathleen) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by TABITHA SMITH. MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. served on 8/23/2018. (Biesecker, Kyle) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Frederick Biesecker on behalf of Plaintiff TABITHA SMITH. (Biesecker, Kyle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC., filed by TABITHA SMITH. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5026420) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons)(Biesecker, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SMITH v. MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TABITHA SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Frederick Biesecker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MACLELLAN INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer L. Bame |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Biggs Wright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
