TAYLOR v. USA
| DAVID B. TAYLOR |
| USA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 3:2018cv00179 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 is denied. Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/26/2018.(JRB) |
Filing 3
Order Denying Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 and Denying a Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons explained in this Order, the motion of David B. Taylor for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 must be denied and this action dismissed. In addition, the court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. Judgment shall now issue and a copy of this Entry shall be filed in Mr. Taylor's criminal case, No. 3:07-cr-20-RLY-WGH. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/26/2018.(JRB)
|
| Filing 2 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 , filed by Petitioner DAVID B. TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HET) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by DAVID B. TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HET) Modified on 9/18/2018 (HET). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
