NEWKIRK v. WARDEN
Petitioner: GARRY NEWKIRK
Respondent: WARDEN
Case Number: 3:2018cv00210
Filed: November 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2018 Filing 8 First MOTION for Leave to Submit Evidence with Ex Parte Restrictions, filed by Respondent WARDEN. (Michaloski, Matthew)
December 19, 2018 Filing 7 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary), filed by WARDEN.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A-Report of Conduct, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B- Screening Report, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT C- Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT D- Disciplinary Hearing Appeal, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT D-1-Disciplinary Hearing Appeal Attachment, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT E-DOC Appeal Denial Letter, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT F-Appendix of Offenses)(Michaloski, Matthew)
December 4, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Alan Michaloski on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Michaloski, Matthew)
November 7, 2018 Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by GARRY NEWKIRK. (JRB)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) - Garry Newkirk's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number BTC 18-08-149. The petitioner shall have through December 6, 2018, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted.n Show Cause Response due by 12/19/2018. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 11/7/2018.(JRB)
November 1, 2018 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET)
November 1, 2018 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by GARRY NEWKIRK. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(HET)
November 1, 2018 Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by GARRY NEWKIRK located at BRANCHVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by GARRY NEWKIRK to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (HET)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEWKIRK v. WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Represented By: Matthew Alan Michaloski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GARRY NEWKIRK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?