BOULTINGHOUSE v. VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT et al
CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE |
VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT, INDIANA SUPREME COURT and DARRYL CHAMBERLAIN |
3:2019cv00097 |
May 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Caryn Nieman Szyper on behalf of Respondent DARRYL CHAMBERLAIN. (Szyper, Caryn) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address for CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE to VANDERBURGH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JRB) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent shall have until August 5, 2019, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. ***Copy sent to IN Attorney General via Email*** Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/21/2019.(JRB) Modified on 6/25/2019 (JRB). |
Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Petitioner CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 8 Submission of Supreme Court Order, filed by Petitioner CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 7 Entry Concerning Selected Matters - The petitioner's motion for copies, #4 is granted to the extent that a copy of that April 17, 2019, Order shall be attached as an Exhibit to this Entry. The motion to substitute the respondent, dkt #5 , is granted. The clerk is directed to terminate Vanderburgh Circuit Court and the Indiana Supreme Court as respondents. The clerk is directed to add Darryl Chamberlain, Jail Commander of the Gibson County Jail, in his official capacity, as the respondent in this action. The petitioner's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, dkt #6 , is granted. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (JRB) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Substitute Respondents, filed by Petitioner CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 4 MOTION Requesting Copies, filed by Petitioner CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Filing 3 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - If this action is to proceed, Mr. Boultinghouse must take the following steps by June 11, 2019: Pay the five-dollar filing fee associated with this habeas action to the Clerk of Court or demonstrate his inability to pay the fee by filing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. File a copy of the Indiana Supreme Court's April 17, 2019, order denying his request for a fast and speedy trial. and Mr. Boultinghouse must file a motion to substitute the respondent. A 2241 habeas petition must be "directed to the person having custody of the person detained. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/13/2019.(JRB) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.