BAKER v. ROLAND
| LAQUANTA BAKER |
| ROLAND |
| 3:2019cv00180 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Entry on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff shall have through November 7, 2019, to comply with these directions or explain why doing so is not possible. The failure to do so by this date will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/8/2019.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. He shall have until 9/30/2019, in which to renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on 8/9/2019. Otherwise, the plaintiff must pay the $400.00 filing fee (see order). Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/3/2019 (copy mailed to Laquanta Baker). (TMC)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy to Plaintiff by US Mail.) (MEH) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Kentucky Western; Case Number 4:19-cv-00098. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 8/29/2019: The instant action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division at Evansville, for all further proceedings. 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). All future filings should be filed in that court. Should further filings be filed in this Court, the Clerk of Court shall transfer the filing to the Southern District of Indiana. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) (JM) [Transferred from Kentucky Western on 8/29/2019.]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Laquanta Baker (DJT) [Transferred from Kentucky Western on 8/29/2019.] |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) [Transferred from Kentucky Western on 8/29/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roland, filed by Laquanta Baker. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (DJT) [Transferred from Kentucky Western on 8/29/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BAKER v. ROLAND | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LAQUANTA BAKER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ROLAND | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
