HAWKINS v. TOYOTA MM INDIANA
LAWANDA J. HAWKINS |
TOYOTA MM INDIANA |
3:2019cv00182 |
August 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING PRO SE INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 11/21/2019 at 10:30 AM (Central Time) before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. The information needed by parties to participate by telephone will be provided by a separate notification. Dispositive Motions due by 4/21/2020. Discovery due by 3/20/2020. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 10/9/2019.(JRB) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Philip J. Pence for TOYOTA MM INDIANA added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 10/3/2019. (JRB) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/2/2019. (JRB) |
Filing 9 AMENDED Corporate Disclosure Statement by TOYOTA MM INDIANA. (Hurka, Thomas) Modified on 10/2/2019 (JRB). |
Filing 8 ***PLEASE DISREGARD. DOCEKTED IN ERROR*** Corporate Disclosure Statement by TOYOTA MM INDIANA. (Hurka, Thomas) Modified on 10/2/2019 (JRB). |
Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney(s) Philip J. Pence to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5658115), filed by Defendant TOYOTA MM INDIANA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Certification of Philip J. Pence in Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Hurka, Thomas) |
Filing 6 ***PLEASE DISREGARD. AMENDED BY #9 *** Corporate Disclosure Statement by TOYOTA MM INDIANA identifying Corporate Parent TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC., Other Affiliate TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION for TOYOTA MM INDIANA.. (Hurka, Thomas) Modified on 10/2/2019 (JRB). |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by TOYOTA MM INDIANA.(Hurka, Thomas) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas F. Hurka on behalf of Defendant TOYOTA MM INDIANA. (Hurka, Thomas) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LAWANDA J. HAWKINS. (JRB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TOYOTA MM INDIANA, filed by LAWANDA J. HAWKINS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HAWKINS v. TOYOTA MM INDIANA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: TOYOTA MM INDIANA | |
Represented By: | Philip J. Pence |
Represented By: | Thomas F. Hurka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LAWANDA J. HAWKINS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.