LONG v. ALVEY et al
| WILLIE L. LONG |
| KATHY ALVEY and M. PRICE |
| 3:2020cv00024 |
| February 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Ten Dollars and Eighty Cents ($10.80). The plaintiff shall have through March 12, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/14/2020. (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by US Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff WILLIE L. LONG. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KATHY ALVEY and M. PRICE, filed by WILLIE L. LONG. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRB) Modified on 2/7/2020 (JRB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
