MARTIN v. SAUL
| MALISSA D. MARTIN |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 3:2020cv00135 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Defendants First Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time - Defendant is granted an enlargement of time, until October 9, 2020, to file the electronic certified administrative record and Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 7/31/2020. (AAS)
|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 10/9/2020 , filed by Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Order (proposed), #2 Appendix Declaration)(Tate, Christie) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christie O'Brien Tate on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Tate, Christie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/11/2020. (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) CLERK'S NOTICE - Pursuant to Local Rule 5-12(a), and by agreement with the United States Attorney, no actual service of initial process is required in Social Security appeals brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, unless otherwise ordered. The Social Security Administration will treat notification through the Court's Case Management and Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF) as service under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the Clerk's Office will refrain from issuance of the submitted summons(es) unless otherwise ordered. (TEXT-ENTRY: There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) (AAS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas C. Newlin on behalf of Plaintiff MALISSA D. MARTIN. (Newlin, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff MALISSA D. MARTIN. (Newlin, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by MALISSA D. MARTIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A - Unfavorable Decision, #4 Exhibit B - Appeal, #5 Exhibit C - Appeal Denial)(Newlin, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MARTIN v. SAUL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MALISSA D. MARTIN | |
| Represented By: | Thomas C. Newlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL | |
| Represented By: | Christie O'Brien Tate |
| Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
