PETERS v. MCGANN
| ANDREW WATSON PETERS |
| KYLE MCGANN |
| 3:2020cv00148 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Produce Discovery, filed by Plaintiff ANDREW WATSON PETERS. (JRB) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Noinitial partial filing fee is due at this time. See order. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/10/2020. (AAS)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ANDREW WATSON PETERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Verification of acount and history)(REO) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against KYLE MCGANN, filed by ANDREW WATSON PETERS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A - Formal Grievance, #3 Exhibit B - Receipt for Grievance, #4 Proposed Summons - Officer McGann's Statement, #5 Exhibit D - formal grievance response, #6 Exhibit E - Level-I appeals to grievance response, #7 Exhibit F - receipt to Level-II formal appeal, #8 Exhibit G - Letter dated 5/12/2020, #9 Exhibit H - Notarized statement from Derek Seals, #10 Exhibit I - Notarized statement from Joshua Joe Jones, #11 Exhibit J - Notarized statement from Anthony Edwards, #12 Exhibit K - request dated 5/5/2020 and response, #13 Exhibit L - request dated 5/5/2020 and response, #14 Exhibit M - request daed 5/6/2020 and response, #15 Exhibit N - remittance slip dated 5/4/2020, #16 Exhibit O - Tort claim dated 5/6/2020, #17 Proposed Summons)(REO) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ANDREW WATSON PETERS located at BRANCHVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ANDREW WATSON PETERS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PETERS v. MCGANN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANDREW WATSON PETERS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KYLE MCGANN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
