WHEELER v. ALVEY et al
| TRACEY WHEELER |
| DAN MITCHELL, LAURA PURCELL, KATHY ALVEY, NICOLE MORRIS and DIANE PFIEFFER |
| 3:2020cv00255 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Reconsideration - Mr. Wheeler's additional exhibit reflects that he lacks sufficient funds to pay an initial partial filing fee. Although Mr. Wheeler is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) when able. Mr. Wheeler's complaint will be screened in due course. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 11/9/2020. (AAS)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration of #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff TRACEY WHEELER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #4 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Thirteen Dollars and Eighty Cents ($13.80). The plaintiff shall have through December 3, 2020, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 11/3/2020. (AAS)
|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, TRACEY WHEELER. (Attachments: #1 Transaction History Reports)(DJH) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of TRACEY WHEELER re #2 Complaint by TRACEY WHEELER. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against KATHY ALVEY, DAN MITCHELL, NICOLE MORRIS, DIANE PFIEFFER, and LAURA PURCELL, filed by TRACEY WHEELER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Request for Interview, #2 Exhibit B records including correspondence, grievance appeals, and tort claim, #3 Proposed Summons)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by TRACEY WHEELER located at BRANCHVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by TRACEY WHEELER to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
