PUGH v. COBB et al
| MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH |
| TED ROBERTSON and T.A COBB |
| 3:2021cv00094 |
| June 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as RETURN TO SENDER; INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS. #3 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH 101 NE 4th Street, Idnianapolis, IN. (JRB) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - Accordingly, the court now directs the clerk to TRANSFER this case to the Terre Haute division. The clerk shall randomly reassign the case and notify Pugh of the newly assigned Judge. Case transferred to 2:21-cv-256-JMS-DLP. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/25/2021.(JRB)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account, #2 Envelope)(LMK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against T.A COBB, TED ROBERTSON, filed by MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
