ALLEN v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE et al
| BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN |
| CITY OF CONNERSVILLE, FAYETTE COUNTY OF INDIANA and FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL |
| 3:2022cv00006 |
| January 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/14/2022.(AAS) |
Filing 18
Order Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Because the amended complaint fails to state a viable constitutional claim on behalf of Mr. Allen, this action is properly dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Judgment dismissing this action with prejudice as to the plaintiff Bruce Edward Allen shall now issue. Nothing in this Order prevents future federal claims brought by a representative of his mother's estate or state law claims in state court. Mr. Allen's motion for the appointment of counsel, dkt. #14 , is denied for the same reasons discussed in the Court's February 3, 2022, Order. Dkt. #12 . SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/14/2022. (AAS)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN, 989087. Plaintiff's custodian is directed to withhold sums from the inmate trust account of BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN, 989087, and to forward such sums to the Clerk of this Court at 46 East Ohio Street, Room 105, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, consistent with paragraph 2 of this Order. The appropriate cause number, 3:22-CV-00006-RLY-MPB, should be placed on each payment sent to the Clerk.As of the issuance of this Order, the balance of the filing fee still due in this case is $350. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/28/2022.(AAS)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - The plaintiff's amended motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #15 , is granted. The motion reflects that the plaintiff lacks the funds to pay the initial partial filing fee. Therefore, the Court will separately issue a collection order to facilitate payment of the filing fee and will screen the plaintiff's amended complaint in due course. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/28/2022. (AAS)
|
| Filing 15 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) |
| Filing 14 Amended Motion for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN. (JRB) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CITY OF CONNERSVILLE, FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL, FAYETTE COUNTY OF INDIANA, filed by BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN.(JRB) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel - Plaintiff's motion for assistance recruiting counsel, dkt. #4 , is denied. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/3/2022. (AAS)
|
|
Filing 11
Order Dismissing Complaint, Addressing Pending Motions, and Providing Opportunity to Show Cause - The plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed for each of the reasons set forth above. The plaintiff shall have through March 1, 2022, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Order should not issue. The plaintiff's motion to pursue his claim as a qui tam action, dkt. #9 , and his related motion to file under seal, dkt. #8 , are denied. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/2/2022. (AAS)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nine Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($9.66). The plaintiff shall have through March 7, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 1/31/2022. (JRB)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Pursue Claim as Qui Tam Action, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN. (AAS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to File Under Seal, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN. (AAS) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN. (AAS) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CITY OF CONNERSVILLE, FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL, FAYETTE COUNTY OF INDIANA, filed by BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN. (No fee paid with this filing) (JRB) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN located at BRANCHVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
