RIGGS et al v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
| DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. |
| AARON L. RIGGS, JONATHAN M. CARROLL, JASON L. CONLEY, TOMMY PARR, MICHAEL L. DUNNING and CORY M. MALONE |
| 3:2022cv00019 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters final judgment in this action. The plaintiffs' petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice. Copy to Petitioners via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/24/2022.(AAS) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE - The petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. SEE ORDER. Copy to Petitioners via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/24/2022.(AAS)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CORY M. MALONE, AARON L. RIGGS, TOMMY PARR, JASON L. CONLEY, JONATHAN M. CARROLL, MICHAEL L. DUNNING. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(AAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
