RAY v. SURHEINRICH et al
| EARL JUSTON RAY |
| JOHN SURHEINRICH, DWAYNE OSBORN and R. NEIVES |
| 3:2022cv00027 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
FINAL ORDER TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE -The court ordered Earl Ray to pay an initial partial filing fee of $1.33. Dkt. #6 . He has not done so. The court grants Mr. Ray through May 27, 2022, to pay his initial partial filing fee as previously ordered. Failure to do so in the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning or opportunity to show cause. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/27/2022.(AAS)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Adrienne Nicole Pope on behalf of Defendants R. NEIVES, DWAYNE OSBORN, JOHN SURHEINRICH. (Pope, Adrienne) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by R. NEIVES, DWAYNE OSBORN, JOHN SURHEINRICH. R. NEIVES waiver sent on 3/22/2022; DWAYNE OSBORN waiver sent on 3/22/2022; JOHN SURHEINRICH waiver sent on 3/22/2022. (Devereux, Ian) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian Devereux on behalf of Defendants R. NEIVES, DWAYNE OSBORN, JOHN SURHEINRICH. (Devereux, Ian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to 1) John Surheinrich ; 2) Dwayne Osborn ; and 3) R. Neives. (JRB) |
|
Filing 6
ENTRY GRANTING IFP AND SCREENING COMPLAINT - Ray's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. 3) is GRANTED. He is DIRECTED to pay an initial partial filing fee of $1.33. Ray's claim for denial of food and water and his claim for denial of clothing are DISMISSED without prejudice, because the allegations lack enough detail to state a plausible claim. Ray may amend his Complaint to add factual allegations to support those claims. The clerk is designated pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process to the John Surheinrich, Dwayne Osborn, and R. Neives in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). SEE ORDER. Copy sent to distribution list via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/22/2022. (JRB)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff EARL JUSTON RAY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by EARL JUSTON RAY located at BRANCHVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by EARL JUSTON RAY to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R. NEIVES, DWAYNE OSBORN, JOHN SURHEINRICH, filed by EARL JUSTON RAY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
