MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. JACK FROST LLC et al
MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
JACK FROST LLC, JAGOE HOMES INC., JUSTIN HICKS and ASHLEY HICKS |
3:2022cv00034 |
March 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - The above case is hereby assigned for a TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on JUNE 16, 2022 at 10:30 a.m., Evansville time (CDT), before the Honorable Matthew P. Brookman, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed for counsel to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a proposed CMP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 5/3/2022.(AAS) |
Filing 17 RETURN of Service, filed by MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. JACK FROST LLC served on 4/27/2022. (Peterson, Ginny) |
Filing 16 RETURN of Service, filed by MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. ASHLEY HICKS served on 4/13/2022; JUSTIN HICKS served on 4/13/2022. (Peterson, Ginny) |
Filing 15 RETURN of Service, filed by MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. JAGOE HOMES INC. served on 4/8/2022. (Peterson, Ginny) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant JACK FROST LLC. (Johnson, Edward) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward W. Johnson on behalf of Defendant JACK FROST LLC. (Johnson, Edward) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Danny E. Glass on behalf of Defendants ASHLEY HICKS, JUSTIN HICKS. (Glass, Danny) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendants ASHLEY HICKS, JUSTIN HICKS. (Kreighbaum, John) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Kreighbaum on behalf of Defendants ASHLEY HICKS, JUSTIN HICKS. (Kreighbaum, John) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Benjamin Gearhart on behalf of Defendant JAGOE HOMES INC.. (Gearhart, Daniel) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant JAGOE HOMES INC.. (Siesky, Lane) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JAGOE HOMES INC.. (Siesky, Lane) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lane C. Siesky on behalf of Defendant JAGOE HOMES INC.. (Siesky, Lane) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ASHLEY HICKS, JUSTIN HICKS, JACK FROST LLC, JAGOE HOMES INC. (AAS) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. (Peterson, Ginny) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ginny L. Peterson on behalf of Plaintiff MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. (Peterson, Ginny) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against ASHLEY HICKS, JUSTIN HICKS, JACK FROST LLC, JAGOE HOMES INC., filed by MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7029756) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint in Underlying Matter, #2 Exhibit B - Third Party Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Frost Policy, #4 Exhibit D - Jagoe Policy, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Peterson, Ginny) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.