PFINGSTON v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al
| HAROLD PFINGSTON |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION and GOOGLE, LLC |
| 3:2022cv00037 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT - Consistent with the court's Entry Dismissing Complaint, the court now enters final judgment against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/1/2022.(JRB) |
Filing 10
ENTRY DISMISSING COMPLAINT - Plaintiff's complaint #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's motions for discovery #7 and #8 are DENIED as MOOT. Final judgment shall issue forthwith. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/1/2022. (JRB)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Work For Microsoft and Linkined, filed by Plaintiff HAROLD PFINGSTON (JRB) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Discovery as to Microsoft, filed by Plaintiff HAROLD PFINGSTON. (JRB) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Discovery as to Google, filed by Plaintiff HAROLD PFINGSTON. (JRB) |
| Filing 6 Submission of Previously Filed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Plaintiff HAROLD PFINGSTON. (JRB) |
|
Filing 5
ENTRY GRANTING IFP AND SCREENING COMPLAINT - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 in GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint, however, fails to state a plausible claim to relief. Plaintiff may remedy that defect by filing an amended complaint that explains, in detail, the factual basis of his claims. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he must do so no later than May 11, 2022. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/11/2022. (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff HAROLD PFINGSTON. (AAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GOOGLE, LLC, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, filed by HAROLD PFINGSTON. (No fee paid with this filing) (AAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
